Comparison of Microhardness of Artificial Teeth with Different Contents After Waiting in Various Liquids Farklı İçeriklerdeki Yapay Dişlerin Sıvılarda Bekletildikten Sonraki Mikrosertliklerinin Karşılaştırılması


Saygın A., YILDIRIMOĞLU M.

Cumhuriyet Dental Journal, cilt.25, sa.2, ss.111-116, 2022 (Scopus) identifier identifier

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 25 Sayı: 2
  • Basım Tarihi: 2022
  • Doi Numarası: 10.7126/cumudj.1060543
  • Dergi Adı: Cumhuriyet Dental Journal
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Scopus, Directory of Open Access Journals, TR DİZİN (ULAKBİM)
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.111-116
  • Anahtar Kelimeler: Acidic beverages, Artificial teeth, Hybrid materials, Microhardness, Pmma
  • Sivas Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

© This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International LicenseObjectives: This study aimed to assess the long-term microhardness of different artificial teeth after waiting in liquids of various pH values. Materials and Methods: Four different artificial teeth [conventional PMMA (Ivostar) as control group), double cross-linked PMMA(DCL), micro-filled composite resin(VivodentPE), nanohybrid composite resin (PhonaresiII)] were used for the study. After the samples fixed on acrylic blocks were immersed in distilled water at 37°C for 24 hours, initial microhardness (T0) measurements were performed. Randomly selected samples from each group were immersed in liquids with different pH values (artificial saliva, kefir, orange juice, cola). Measurements repeated on the 7th day on the same samples were recorded as T1, and measurements repeated on the 14th day were recorded as T2. The data obtained were evaluated in the SPSS 22.0 program. Friedman and Kruskall Wallis tests were used to compare of the groups. Results: While the highest initial microhardness averages were found in the Phonares II group, the lowest average belongs to the Ivostar group. Microhardness findings of all materials measured at different times were obtained in the order of T0>T1>T2. When the data of samples aged in different liquids are compared, significant differences are observed. When the microhardness measurements of a single material exposed in different solutions were compared, no difference was found between the solutions. Conclusions: A decrease in microhardness of materials that are immersed in liquids with different pH values for a long time was observed, and the microhardness of the materials exposed to these solutions is adversely affected