Comparison of the Effect of the Same Polishing Method on the Surface Roughness of Conventional, CAD/CAM Milling and 3D Printing Denture Base Materials Konvansiyonel, CAD/CAM Kazıma ve 3D Baskılı Protez Kaide Materyalleri Üzerine Uygulanan Aynı Polisaj Yönteminin Yüzey Pürüzlülüğüne Etkisinin Karşılaştırılması


Creative Commons License

DEMİRKOL D., TUĞUT F.

Cumhuriyet Dental Journal, cilt.26, sa.3, ss.281-286, 2023 (Scopus) identifier identifier

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 26 Sayı: 3
  • Basım Tarihi: 2023
  • Doi Numarası: 10.7126/cumudj.1317851
  • Dergi Adı: Cumhuriyet Dental Journal
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Scopus, Directory of Open Access Journals, TR DİZİN (ULAKBİM)
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.281-286
  • Anahtar Kelimeler: 3D Printing, CAD/CAM Milling, Denture base material, Polishing, Surface Roughness
  • Sivas Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of both the same polishing method and those with and without thermal aging on the surface roughness of conventional, CAD/CAM milling and 3D printing denture base materials. Materials and Methods: A total of 30 round shaped specimens were obtained by 3 different methods: Conventional, CAD/CAM milling and 3D printing. After applying the same polishing technique to all groups, surface roughness values were measured. Profilometer device was used for surface roughness measurement. Then, after the thermal aging of all samples, surface roughness values were measured and the roughness values between no-thermocycling and thermocycling were compared. Tukey, Mann Whitney U and Kruskal Wallis tests were used statistically. P values of ≤ 0.05 were considered significant. Results: As a result of the same polishing process, there was a difference in surface roughness in all groups. While the highest surface roughness values were seen in 3D printing, the lowest roughness value was seen in the CAD/CAM milling and was statistically significant. Thermocycling did not show a statistically significant difference in surface roughness. Conclusions: The same polishing process caused different surface roughness values in the denture base materials obtained with different methods, and the lowest surface roughness value was seen in the CAD/CAM milling.