Comparison of the Predictive Performance of qSOFA, APACHE2 and SGS for evaluation of the disease prognosis of CCHF patients at the Emergency Department.

Demirtas E., Bakir M., Ali B., Oksuz C., Oz M., Cebecioglu K., ...Daha Fazla

Japanese journal of infectious diseases, cilt.73, ss.323-329, 2020 (SCI-Expanded) identifier identifier identifier

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 73
  • Basım Tarihi: 2020
  • Doi Numarası: 10.7883/yoken.jjid.2019.507
  • Dergi Adı: Japanese journal of infectious diseases
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus, Agricultural & Environmental Science Database, BIOSIS, CAB Abstracts, EMBASE, MEDLINE, Veterinary Science Database
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.323-329
  • Sivas Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

In this study, we compared the predictive performances of quick sequential organ failure assessment (qSOFA), the acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE II) scores, and the severity grading score (SGS) for evaluation of the disease prognosis of patients with Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever (CCHF) at the emergency department. We recorded the qSOFA, SGS, and APACHE II scores at admission and at the 72nd and 120th hour in 97 patients admitted to the emergency department and diagnosed with CCHF. In our study, the area under a receiver operating characteristic curve values of qSOFA, SGS, and APACHE II at admission were found to be 0.640, 0.824, and 0.576, respectively. No statistical significance was found for a qSOFA score >= 2 at admission as a predictor of mortality. The use of qSOFA score for diseases with a mortal prognosis such as CCHF is insufficient in predicting the prognosis.