Integrating Marketing, Communication, Logistics, and Blockchain in Sustainable Supply Chain Practices: A Multidisciplinary Best-Worst Method and Fuzzy DEMATEL Approach
Sustainability (Switzerland), cilt.18, sa.17, 2026 (SCI-Expanded, SSCI, Scopus)
- Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
- Cilt numarası: 18 Sayı: 17
- Basım Tarihi: 2026
- Doi Numarası: 10.3390/su18179201
- Dergi Adı: Sustainability (Switzerland)
- Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI), Scopus, CAB Abstracts, Geobase, INSPEC
- Anahtar Kelimeler: adoption barriers, best-worst method, blockchain, fuzzy DEMATEL, marketing integration, multi-criteria decision-making, sustainable supply chain management
- Sivas Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet
Özet
Integrating blockchain technology into the marketing, communication, and logistics processes of sustainable supply chains faces multidimensional barriers. This study uses a mixed-methods approach to identify, prioritize, and analyze the expert-perceived influence relationships among these barriers. Semi-structured interviews with 14 managers and experts were thematically analyzed in MAXQDA to derive the barrier criteria, weighted and structurally analyzed using the Best-Worst Method (BWM) and Fuzzy DEMATEL with judgments from 11 domain experts, re-derived from the raw questionnaire data. BWM identifies Legal and Regulatory Barriers (C1, w = 0.2225) and Economic Barriers (C5, w = 0.2110) as most critical, jointly accounting for 43.4% of the total weight; nine of eleven experts’ solutions met the CR < 0.10 threshold; the remaining two (E4 and E9) were retained rather than adjusted. Fuzzy DEMATEL classifies Economic, Legal, and Trust barriers as cause-group factors and Technological, Institutional, and Knowledge barriers as effect-group factors, with Economic Barriers showing the strongest net driving influence (D − R = +0.705). The two highest-priority barriers are also the two most upstream, and sensitivity analysis confirms the top and bottom ranks are stable. Interventions targeting cause-group barriers may generate broader system-level effects across effect-group barriers, an expectation grounded in expert-perceived influence rather than demonstrated causal evidence.